Mudry v. Giannattasio

8 A.D.3d 455, 779 N.Y.S.2d 111
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 14, 2004·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust on certain real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated August 11, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

[456] Because the prior determination upon which the order appealed from was predicated did not indicate an intention to dismiss on the merits, the order cannot be deemed a basis for the application of the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel. Accordingly, the defendant’s motion to dismiss should have been denied. Florio, J.P., Adams, Cozier and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mudry v. Giannattasio, 8 A.D.3d 455, 779 N.Y.S.2d 111 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

8 A.D.3d 455 (Mudry v. Giannattasio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

NYCTL 1999-1 Trust v. 573 Jackson Avenue Realty Corp.
39 A.D.3d 267 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Tuper v. Tuper
34 A.D.3d 1280 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Espinoza v. Concordia International Forwarding Corp.
32 A.D.3d 326 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)