Mudd v. Fish

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6028

GEORGE MUDD,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

IRWIN W. FISH,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:08-cv-00641-jlk-mfu)

Submitted: June 23, 2010 Decided: July 15, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Mudd, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Bugbee Winn, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

George Mudd appeals the district court’s order

granting Defendant summary judgment on what it construed as an

action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of

Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

the district court’s order. See Mudd v. Fish, No. 7:08-cv-

00641-jlk-mfu (W.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED