Mudano v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

543 So. 2d 876, 1989 WL 55968
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 31, 1989
Docket88-1287
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 543 So. 2d 876 (Mudano v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mudano v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 543 So. 2d 876, 1989 WL 55968 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

543 So.2d 876 (1989)

Frank R. MUDANO, Personal Representative of the Estate of Salvo Mudano, Appellant,
v.
ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Appellees.

No. 88-1287.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 31, 1989.

Alyssa M. Reiter of Bunnell and Woulfe, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

*877 Rhea P. Grossman of Rhea P. Grossman, P.A., Miami, and Lanza, O'Connor, Armstrong, Sinclair & Tunstall, P.A., Coral Gables, for Appellee-Community Asphalt Corp.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order taxing fees and costs pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes. The statute provides for the award of attorney's fees and costs under specified circumstances where an offer of judgment is not accepted. The accident and injury in question occurred prior to July 1, 1986, the effective date of the statute.

Chapter 768, Florida Statutes, "NEGLIGENCE," is divided into three parts. Part III, "DAMAGES," contains sections 768.71 through 768.81. Section 768.71, entitled "Applicability; conflicts," provides, in part:

(2) This part applies only to causes of action arising on or after July 1, 1986, and does not apply to any cause of action arising before that date.

The trial court ruled that the statute was procedural and therefore applied retroactively. However, we conclude that the statute, by its terms, does not apply to offers of judgment where the underlying cause of action accrued prior to its effective date. Further, the statute, in any event, affects substantive rights, and therefore may only be applied prospectively. See Smith v. Department of Insurance, 507 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 1987). Cf. Young v. Altenhaus, 472 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1985); Tindall v. Miller, 463 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 475 So.2d 695 (Fla. 1985); Parrish v. Mullis, 458 So.2d 401 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Therefore, the order is reversed and the cause remanded.

DOWNEY, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hull & Company, Inc. v. Thomas
834 So. 2d 904 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Dynasty Express Corp. v. Weiss
675 So. 2d 235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Metropolitan Dade County v. Jones Boatyard, Inc.
611 So. 2d 512 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Reinhardt v. Bono
564 So. 2d 1233 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
543 So. 2d 876, 1989 WL 55968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mudano-v-st-paul-fire-marine-ins-co-fladistctapp-1989.