Home/Second Circuit/Mud Scows Nos. 18, 19, 21, 25, & 31

Mud Scows Nos. 18, 19, 21, 25, & 31

64 F. 495, 12 C.C.A. 359, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2384
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 29, 1893
DocketNo. 96
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 64 F. 495 (Mud Scows Nos. 18, 19, 21, 25, & 31) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mud Scows Nos. 18, 19, 21, 25, & 31, 64 F. 495, 12 C.C.A. 359, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2384 (2d Cir. 1893).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We do not think the sum allowed as salvage in this case, viz. $150 for each 86,000 scow, is at all unreasonable, irrespective of any calculation as to the proba bilily of one or more of them causing damage, while adrift, to other vessels. Therefore, in affirming the decree, we do not think it necessary to discuss the questions raised as to the propriety of taking that contingency into consideration in fixing the amount of salvage allowance. The decree of the district court is affirmed, with interest and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boyd v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.
170 F. 779 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Washington, 1909)
McRae v. Bowers Dredging Co.
86 F. 344 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 F. 495, 12 C.C.A. 359, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mud-scows-nos-18-19-21-25-31-ca2-1893.