Muckleroy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Muckleroy v. State

146 S.W. 199, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 698

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 10, 1912·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault, and his punishment was assessed at $500 and three months in the county jail.

A jury was waived, and appellant tried by the court. There are no bills of exceptions in the record and no statement of facts. A question arose, on the motion for new trial, between the attorneys as to an agreement on a plea of guilty. This matter was settled by the court, and in this attitude of the record this court is not in a position to review that question. The evidence is not in the record.

Finding no reversible error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault, and his punishment was assessed at $500 and three months in the county jail.

A jury was waived, and appellant tried by the court. There are no bills of exceptions in the record and no statement of facts. A question arose, on the motion for new trial, between the attorneys as to an agreement on a plea of guilty. This matter was settled by the court, and in this attitude of the record this court is not in a position to review that question. The evidence is not in the record.

Finding no reversible error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Muckleroy v. State, 146 S.W. 199, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 698 (Tex. 1912).

Pincite

146 S.W. 199 (Muckleroy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.