Muchnick v. Alcamo Supply & Contracting Corp.
This text of 169 A.D.2d 711 (Muchnick v. Alcamo Supply & Contracting Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Luciano, J.), entered November 16, 1988, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $17,754.55.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The defendants’ claim that the plaintiff lacked the capacity to sue on the contract is untimely. By failing to assert such a defense in a motion before the service of their answer or in the answer itself, they have waived any objection to the plaintiff’s standing (see, CPLR 3211 [e]; Matter of Prudco Realty Corp. v Palermo, 60 NY2d 656, 657; Erljur Assocs. v Weissman, 134 AD2d 321).
Moreover, the findings of fact by the trial court were not against the weight of the evidence (see, Strauf v Ettson Enters., 106 AD2d 737).
[712]*712We find the defendants’ remaining contentions to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Lawrence and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 A.D.2d 711, 564 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muchnick-v-alcamo-supply-contracting-corp-nyappdiv-1991.