Mucci v. Ruggerio

133 A.D.2d 816, 520 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51856
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 26, 1987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated November 7, 1986, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The conclusory statements offered by the injured plaintiff and her doctor in their affidavits in opposition to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment fail to establish a prima facie case of "serious injury” (Spangenberg v Dombrowski, 114 AD2d 497, 498; see, Post v Broderick, 104 AD2d 977). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mucci v. Ruggerio, 133 A.D.2d 816, 520 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

133 A.D.2d 816 (Mucci v. Ruggerio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gleason v. Huber
188 A.D.2d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)