Mucci v. Ruggerio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mucci v. Ruggerio

133 A.D.2d 816, 520 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51856

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 26, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 133 A.D.2d 816 (Mucci v. Ruggerio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mucci v. Ruggerio, 133 A.D.2d 816, 520 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated November 7, 1986, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The conclusory statements offered by the injured plaintiff and her doctor in their affidavits in opposition to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment fail to establish a prima facie case of "serious injury” (Spangenberg v Dombrowski, 114 AD2d 497, 498; see, Post v Broderick, 104 AD2d 977). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated November 7, 1986, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The conclusory statements offered by the injured plaintiff and her doctor in their affidavits in opposition to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment fail to establish a prima facie case of "serious injury” (Spangenberg v Dombrowski, 114 AD2d 497, 498; see, Post v Broderick, 104 AD2d 977). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 A.D.2d 816, 520 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mucci-v-ruggerio-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack