Muben-Lamar, L.P. v. Florida Department of Revenue

789 So. 2d 337, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 433, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1256, 2001 WL 720696
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 28, 2001·No. No. SC00-1111·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted for review Muben-Lamar, L.P. v. Department of Revenue, 763 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), on the basis of express and direct conflict with Kuro, Inc. v. State Department of Revenue, 713 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we determine that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Muben-Lamar, L.P. v. Florida Department of Revenue, 789 So. 2d 337, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 433, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1256, 2001 WL 720696 (Fla. 2001).

789 So. 2d 337 (Muben-Lamar, L.P. v. Florida Department of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crescent Miami Center v. Dept. of Revenue
903 So. 2d 913 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Crescent Miami Center, LLC v. DEPT. OF REVENUE, STATE
857 So. 2d 904 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)