Mubarak Qureshi v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mubarak Qureshi v. State

152 So. 3d 680, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18839, 2014 WL 6460790

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 19, 2014

Docket4D13-1522

StatusPublished

This text of 152 So. 3d 680 (Mubarak Qureshi v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mubarak Qureshi v. State, 152 So. 3d 680, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18839, 2014 WL 6460790 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

At the violation of probation hearing in this case, the trial judge found that appellant violated his probation by committing new substantive offenses. However, the written order of revocation of probation, which issued several days later, indicated that the basis for revocation was a failure to pay restitution, in addition to the commission of a new criminal offense.

Appellant did not file a motion to correct a sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). See Jackson v. State, 983 So.2d 562, 572 (Fla.2008); Rivera v. State, 34 So.3d 207, 208 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). By failing to file a Rule 3.800(b) motion, appellant waived this issue and cannot raise it on appeal. See Reese v. State, 763 So.2d 537, 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Affirmed.

GROSS, TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI