M.U. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

M.U. v. State

668 So. 2d 1057, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1587, 1996 WL 75805

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 23, 1996·No. No. 94-03266·Published

Opinion

PATTERSON, Judge.

The appellant challenges his adjudication of guilt for aggravated assault with a firearm and trespass and his commitment to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. We find no error in the appellant’s adjudication and commitment and therefore affirm. However, as the appellant correctly argues, the trial court erred in imposing a general sentence for two separate offenses. See T.A.R. v. State, 640 So.2d 222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); H.L.L. v. State, 595 So.2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Accordingly, we remand for the entry of a separate disposition order for each offense.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.

SCHOONOVER, Acting C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PATTERSON, Judge.

The appellant challenges his adjudication of guilt for aggravated assault with a firearm and trespass and his commitment to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. We find no error in the appellant’s adjudication and commitment and therefore affirm. However, as the appellant correctly argues, the trial court erred in imposing a general sentence for two separate offenses. See T.A.R. v. State, 640 So.2d 222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); H.L.L. v. State, 595 So.2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Accordingly, we remand for the entry of a separate disposition order for each offense.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.

SCHOONOVER, Acting C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur.

M.U. v. State, 668 So. 2d 1057, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1587, 1996 WL 75805 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

668 So. 2d 1057 (M.U. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related