M.T.S. v. State

920 So. 2d 1248, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2457, 2006 WL 435820
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 24, 2006·No. No. 5D06-181·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find the motion for disqualification legally sufficient when the facts therein are taken as true.1 The motion should have been granted. Therefore, we grant the petition for writ of prohibition, and remand with directions to grant the motion for disqualification.

PETITION GRANTED.

SHARP, W., SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M.T.S. v. State, 920 So. 2d 1248, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2457, 2006 WL 435820 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

920 So. 2d 1248 (M.T.S. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sprague v. State
920 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)