MTS Systems Corp. v. Hysitron Inc.
This text of MTS Systems Corp. v. Hysitron Inc. (MTS Systems Corp. v. Hysitron Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1541
MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
HYSITRON INCORPORATED,
Defendant-Appellant.
Nicholas S. Boebel, Myers, Boebel & MacLeod L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellee.
David P. Pearson, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Thomas H. Boyd and Brent A. Lorentz.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
Chief Judge Michael J. Davis NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2009-1541
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
in CASE NO(S). 06-CV-3853
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (LOURIE, RADER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED April 8, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MTS Systems Corp. v. Hysitron Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mts-systems-corp-v-hysitron-inc-cafc-2010.