MTS Minor Trading v. Diaz

290 A.D.2d 296, 735 N.Y.S.2d 774, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 287

This text of 290 A.D.2d 296 (MTS Minor Trading v. Diaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MTS Minor Trading v. Diaz, 290 A.D.2d 296, 735 N.Y.S.2d 774, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 287 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered on or about October 2, 2000, which, after a traverse hearing, granted defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment and dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The action was properly dismissed for failure to show that the address where the summons and complaint were delivered to a person other than defendant was defendant’s dwelling place or usual place of abode (CPLR 308 [2]; 5015 [a] [4]; see, Feinstein v Bergner, 48 NY2d 234, 239-241). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Rosenberger, Lerner, Buckley and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Feinstein v. Bergner
397 N.E.2d 1161 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
290 A.D.2d 296, 735 N.Y.S.2d 774, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mts-minor-trading-v-diaz-nyappdiv-2002.