MTB Bank-in-Liquidation v. Lloyd's Underwriters of Directors

7 A.D.3d 276, 776 N.Y.S.2d 789, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6582
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 6, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.), entered July 11, 2003, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In 1997, an officer of plaintiff became a target of a federal grand jury investigation. The following year, a criminal information charged unnamed officers of plaintiff with participating in a fraudulent scheme. Taking the plain and ordinary meaning of the contract terms (McGrail v Equitable Life Assur. Socy., [277] 292 NY 419, 424 [1944]) within the four corners of the insurance policy (W.W.W. Assoc. v Giancontieri, 77 NY2d 157, 162 [1990]), the court properly concluded that the formal investigatory proceedings commenced in 1997 and 1998 constituted a “claim” lodged against plaintiff prior to the policy period, and thus were not covered thereunder. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MTB Bank-in-Liquidation v. Lloyd's Underwriters of Directors, 7 A.D.3d 276, 776 N.Y.S.2d 789, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

7 A.D.3d 276 (MTB Bank-in-Liquidation v. Lloyd's Underwriters of Directors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Partnership 92 West v. Dobrolowicz
10 Misc. 3d 23 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)