MT. OLIVET TABERNACLE v. Edwin Wiegand Div.
This text of 811 A.2d 565 (MT. OLIVET TABERNACLE v. Edwin Wiegand Div.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MOUNT OLIVET TABERNACLE CHURCH, Appellee
v.
EDWIN WIEGAND DIVISION; Emerson Electric Company, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Maureen Murphy McBride, John J. Cunningham, William H. Lamb, James C. Sargent, Westchester, for appellants, Edwin Wiegand Div.; Emerson Elec. Co.
James Michael Beck, Philadelphia, for appellant amicus curiae, Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc.
Gregory Barton Abeln, Carlisle, for appellant amicus curiae, Washington Legal Foundation (WLF) and PA Chamber of Business and Industry.
Margaret S. Woodruff, Philadelphia, for appellant amicus curiae, Nat. Ass'n of Mfrs.
Gaele M. Barthold, Richard W. Yost, Philadelphia, for appellee, Mount Olivet Tabernacle Church.
Before ZAPPALA, C.J., and CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Order of the Superior Court is affirmed. The Petition for Permission to File Post-Submission Communication in Accordance with Pa.R.A.P. 2501(a) is granted.
Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
811 A.2d 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mt-olivet-tabernacle-v-edwin-wiegand-div-pa-2002.