Mt. Olive & Staunton Coal Co. v. Rademacher

Appellate Court of Illinois

Mt. Olive & Staunton Coal Co. v. Rademacher

92 Ill. App. 442, 1900 Ill. App. LEXIS 802

DecidedDecember 7, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 92 Ill. App. 442 (Mt. Olive & Staunton Coal Co. v. Rademacher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mt. Olive & Staunton Coal Co. v. Rademacher, 92 Ill. App. 442, 1900 Ill. App. LEXIS 802 (Ill. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barker

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellee recovered a judgment of $3,000 against appellant on account of the death of her husband, caused by the falling of slate from the roof of a coal mine entry while he was working in appellant’s mine.

The circumstances under which Rademacher met his death are set forth in the case of Mt. Olive and Staunton Coal Company v. Berbeck, arofe, p. 441. We hold appellant is liable in this case for the reasons appearing in the opinion in that case.

Counsel for appellant, in addition to the contentions urged in that case for a reversal of the judgment, insist that the court erred in this case in giving appellant’s second instruction. The instruction told the jury that if they should believe from the evidence that the plaintiff had proven her case as laid in the declaration, then they should find the issues for the plaintiff. The objection urged by the counsel is that it ignored the defense set up by appellant, i. e., that Rademacher had specially contracted tó take down the slate that injured him. Without making any observations as to the legality of an agreement to dispense with props when necessary in “ driving ” an entry, it is sufficient to say that the jury found, in answer to a special interrogatory, that Rademacher was not specially employed to take down the slate. Even if the instruction were objectionable, it worked no harm to appellant. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Barker

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellee recovered a judgment of $3,000 against appellant on account of the death of her husband, caused by the falling of slate from the roof of a coal mine entry while he was working in appellant’s mine.

The circumstances under which Rademacher met his death are set forth in the case of Mt. Olive and Staunton Coal Company v. Berbeck, arofe, p. 441. We hold appellant is liable in this case for the reasons appearing in the opinion in that case.

Counsel for appellant, in addition to the contentions urged in that case for a reversal of the judgment, insist that the court erred in this case in giving appellant’s second instruction. The instruction told the jury that if they should believe from the evidence that the plaintiff had proven her case as laid in the declaration, then they should find the issues for the plaintiff. The objection urged by the counsel is that it ignored the defense set up by appellant, i. e., that Rademacher had specially contracted tó take down the slate that injured him. Without making any observations as to the legality of an agreement to dispense with props when necessary in “ driving ” an entry, it is sufficient to say that the jury found, in answer to a special interrogatory, that Rademacher was not specially employed to take down the slate. Even if the instruction were objectionable, it worked no harm to appellant. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 Ill. App. 442, 1900 Ill. App. LEXIS 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mt-olive-staunton-coal-co-v-rademacher-illappct-1900.