Mt. Hawley Insurance Co. v. American States Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mt. Hawley Insurance Co. v. American States Insurance Co.

2017 NY Slip Op 615, 146 A.D.3d 735, 48 N.Y.S.3d 312

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 31, 2017

Docket2963N 156663/14

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 615 (Mt. Hawley Insurance Co. v. American States Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mt. Hawley Insurance Co. v. American States Insurance Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 615, 146 A.D.3d 735, 48 N.Y.S.3d 312 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered on or about September 14, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant American States Insurance Company’s cross motion for summary judgment declaring in its favor, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Although this Court, on a prior appeal, upheld the default judgment against defendant J&R Glassworks, Inc. (139 AD3d 497, 498 [1st Dept 2016]), American States is not entitled to declaratory relief in its favor on its cross motion for summary judgment. In the event of a default by a defendant, that defendant admits to the allegations against it in the complaint *736 (Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d 62, 71 [2003]). Here, the amended complaint states that “if” plaintiffs 537 West 27th Street Owners, LLC and Chatsworth Builders, LLC are not covered by the insurance policy issued by American States, “then” J&R breached its agreement with plaintiffs. That is the claim that has been defaulted on. Accordingly, should it be determined that coverage does not exist, then J&R cannot challenge whether that amounts to a breach of the agreement, since it has admitted that breach through its default. However, the question of whether coverage exists must be resolved first.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Saxe and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered on or about September 14, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant American States Insurance Company’s cross motion for summary judgment declaring in its favor, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Although this Court, on a prior appeal, upheld the default judgment against defendant J&R Glassworks, Inc. (139 AD3d 497, 498 [1st Dept 2016]), American States is not entitled to declaratory relief in its favor on its cross motion for summary judgment. In the event of a default by a defendant, that defendant admits to the allegations against it in the complaint *736 (Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d 62, 71 [2003]). Here, the amended complaint states that “if” plaintiffs 537 West 27th Street Owners, LLC and Chatsworth Builders, LLC are not covered by the insurance policy issued by American States, “then” J&R breached its agreement with plaintiffs. That is the claim that has been defaulted on. Accordingly, should it be determined that coverage does not exist, then J&R cannot challenge whether that amounts to a breach of the agreement, since it has admitted that breach through its default. However, the question of whether coverage exists must be resolved first.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Saxe and Gische, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 615, 146 A.D.3d 735, 48 N.Y.S.3d 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mt-hawley-insurance-co-v-american-states-insurance-co-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack