M&T BANK v. HR STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in M&T BANK v. HR STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.. Read the opinion of the Court — 106 A.D.3d 1498
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 3, 2013·No. CA 12-02021·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

422 CA 12-02021 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

M&T BANK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

HR STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND V. MICHAEL PRENCIPE, ALSO KNOWN AS VINCENT M. PRENCIPE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

LIPPES MATHIAS WEXLER FRIEDMAN LLP, BUFFALO (BRENDAN H. LITTLE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

GETMAN & BIRYLA, LLP, BUFFALO (PATRICK A. MAKIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered December 27, 2011. The order granted the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment and awarded plaintiff money damages.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Entered: May 3, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M&T BANK v. HR STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

M&T BANK v. HR STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC. (M&T BANK v. HR STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)