M&T BANK v. BENJAMIN, RONALD R.
This text of M&T BANK v. BENJAMIN, RONALD R. (M&T BANK v. BENJAMIN, RONALD R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
1105 CA 16-00547 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
M&T BANK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
V ORDER
RONALD R. BENJAMIN, ALSO KNOWN AS RONALD BENJAMIN, ALSO KNOWN AS RONALD R. BENJAMIN, ESQ., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
LAW OFFICE OF RONALD R. BENJAMIN, BINGHAMTON (MARY JANE MURPHY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
GETMAN & BIRYLA, LLP, BUFFALO (JOSEPH S. MONTAGNOLA OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M. Curran, J.), entered December 23, 2015. The order, inter alia, granted the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
Entered: December 23, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
M&T BANK v. BENJAMIN, RONALD R., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mt-bank-v-benjamin-ronald-r-nyappdiv-2016.