M.T. AND A.T. vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, M.M. A/K/A M.P., AND F.P., IN RE: THE ADOPTION OF N.T. AND R.T., CHILDREN
This text of M.T. AND A.T. vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, M.M. A/K/A M.P., AND F.P., IN RE: THE ADOPTION OF N.T. AND R.T., CHILDREN (M.T. AND A.T. vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, M.M. A/K/A M.P., AND F.P., IN RE: THE ADOPTION OF N.T. AND R.T., CHILDREN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
M.T. AND A.T.,
Appellants, Case No. 5D22-780 v. LT Case No. 2021-DP-577-O
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, M.M. A/K/A M.P., AND F.P., IN RE: THE ADOPTION OF N.T. AND R.T., CHILDREN,
Appellees. ___________________________________________/
Decision filed July 14, 2022
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Daniel Dawson, Judge.
Katie Jay, of Jay & Campbell, PLLC, Stuart, for Appellants.
Stephanie C. Zimmerman, Deputy Director and Statewide Director of Appeals, of Children's Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee, Department of Children and Families.
No Appearance for Other Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
WALLIS, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
M.T. AND A.T. vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, M.M. A/K/A M.P., AND F.P., IN RE: THE ADOPTION OF N.T. AND R.T., CHILDREN, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mt-and-at-vs-department-of-children-and-families-mm-aka-mp-and-fladistctapp-2022.