MSOF CORPORATION v. Exxon Corporation

938 So. 2d 78
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedOctober 6, 2006
Docket2006-C-1669
StatusPublished

This text of 938 So. 2d 78 (MSOF CORPORATION v. Exxon Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MSOF CORPORATION v. Exxon Corporation, 938 So. 2d 78 (La. 2006).

Opinion

938 So.2d 78 (2006)

MSOF CORPORATION and Jay Paul Leblanc
v.
EXXON CORPORATION, Exxon Chemical Company, U.S.S. Chemical Company, Copolymer Rubber and Chemical Corporation, Uniroyal Corporation, Dow Chemical Company, Ethyl Corporation, Shell Chemical *79 Corporation, American Hoechst Co. (f/k/a Foster Grant Company), Allied Chemical Corporation, Rubicon Chemical Company, Petro Processors of Louisiana, Inc., Rollins Environmental Services (LA), Robert Bolger, J.W. Street, W.L. Rainey, NPC Services, Inc., and XYZ Insurance Company.

No. 2006-C-1669.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 6, 2006.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
938 So. 2d 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/msof-corporation-v-exxon-corporation-la-2006.