MSCI Inc. v. Jacob

96 A.D.3d 637, 946 N.Y.S.2d 575

This text of 96 A.D.3d 637 (MSCI Inc. v. Jacob) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MSCI Inc. v. Jacob, 96 A.D.3d 637, 946 N.Y.S.2d 575 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J), entered November 14, 2011, which granted defendant Philip Jacob’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ seventh cause of action alleging that he violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) (18 USC § 1030), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly determined that plaintiffs failed to state a cause of action under the CFAA. Even assuming the truth of the allegations in the complaint (see generally Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), the CFAA does not encompass Jacob’s misappropriation of information that he lawfully accessed while working for plaintiffs or misuse of work computers in violation of their computer policies (see United States v Nosal, 676 F3d 854 [9th Cir 2012]; see also University Sports Pub. Co. v Playmakers Media Co., 725 F Supp 2d 378, 385 [SD NY 2010]).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Nosal
676 F.3d 854 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Leon v. Martinez
638 N.E.2d 511 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
University Sports Publications Co. v. Playmakers Media Co.
725 F. Supp. 2d 378 (S.D. New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 A.D.3d 637, 946 N.Y.S.2d 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/msci-inc-v-jacob-nyappdiv-2012.