M.S. v. State

632 So. 2d 1147, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2487, 1994 WL 84183
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in M.S. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5925
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 1994·No. No. 94-524·Published

Opinion

GOSHORN, Judge.

Petitioner, a juvenile being held in secure detention prior to his adjudicatory hearing, seeks a writ of habeas corpus directing his release because he claims he does not qualify for detention under section 39.044, Florida Statutes (1993). However, as in DepaHment of H.R.S. v. State, 599 So.2d 123, 127 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), we are not convinced that H.R.S. has correctly scored the juvenile’s risk assessment instrument. Based on facial inconsistencies in the risk assessment instrument and the absence of any supporting documentation, petitioner has failed to establish that his detention is unlawful and therefore the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

PETITION DENIED.

HARRIS, C.J., and THOMPSON, J, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M.S. v. State, 632 So. 2d 1147, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2487, 1994 WL 84183 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

632 So. 2d 1147 (M.S. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. State
599 So. 2d 123 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)