M.S. v. L.S.
This text of M.S. v. L.S. (M.S. v. L.S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 22-MAY-2026 08:26 AM Dkt. 11 OGAC SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I
M.S., Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
L.S., Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 5FDV-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Devens, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ.; and Ginoza, J., dissenting, with whom Circuit Judge Jackson, assigned by reason of vacancy, joins)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant L.S.’ application for writ
of certiorari filed on April 14, 2026, is accepted.
It is further ordered, that no oral argument will be heard
in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant
to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai‘i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 22, 2026.
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins DISSENT BY GINOZA, J.
I respectfully dissent to the majority’s Order Accepting
Application for Writ of Certiorari, and would dismiss the
application as untimely. See Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes § 602-
59(c) (Supp. 2017); Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule
40.1(a) (“A party may seek review of the intermediate court of
appeals’ decision by filing an application for a writ of
certiorari in the supreme court. The application shall be filed
within 30 days after the filing of the intermediate court of
appeals’ judgment on appeal . . . unless the time for filing the
application is extended in accordance with this Rule.”).
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Kauanoe A.D. Jackson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
M.S. v. L.S., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ms-v-ls-haw-2026.