M.S. v. Department of Children & Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

M.S. v. Department of Children & Families

827 So. 2d 1089, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14788, 2002 WL 31295102

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 14, 2002

DocketNo. 1D02-35

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 827 So. 2d 1089 (M.S. v. Department of Children & Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M.S. v. Department of Children & Families, 827 So. 2d 1089, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14788, 2002 WL 31295102 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A circuit court’s dependency order “must state the facts upon which the finding is made.” In the Interest of T.S.; M.H.W. v. Dep’t of Health and Rehabilitative Serv’s, 557 So.2d 676, 677 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Failure to make the statutorily required findings of fact requires that the adjudication be vacated. See Williams v. Dep’t of Health and Rehabilitative Serv’s,Z568 So.2d 995, 996-97 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); J.C.G. v. Dep’t of Children and Families, 780 So.2d 965, 967 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). In the instant case, the trial court’s order fails to adequately state facts upon which the conclusion of abuse was made, or to state any facts to support the conclusion that the relationship between appellant and her child is unhealthy. The trial court’s order cannot be salvaged as one that tracked the factual allegations of the Amended Petition for Dependency. See Williams, 568 So.2d at 997; Castellanos v. Dep’t of Health and Rehabilitative Serv’s, 545 So.2d 455, 458 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The Order of Adjudication of Dependency is VACATED and the cause REMANDED for further proceedings.

BARFIELD, KAHN and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A circuit court’s dependency order “must state the facts upon which the finding is made.” In the Interest of T.S.; M.H.W. v. Dep’t of Health and Rehabilitative Serv’s, 557 So.2d 676, 677 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Failure to make the statutorily required findings of fact requires that the adjudication be vacated. See Williams v. Dep’t of Health and Rehabilitative Serv’s,Z568 So.2d 995, 996-97 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); J.C.G. v. Dep’t of Children and Families, 780 So.2d 965, 967 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). In the instant case, the trial court’s order fails to adequately state facts upon which the conclusion of abuse was made, or to state any facts to support the conclusion that the relationship between appellant and her child is unhealthy. The trial court’s order cannot be salvaged as one that tracked the factual allegations of the Amended Petition for Dependency. See Williams, 568 So.2d at 997; Castellanos v. Dep’t of Health and Rehabilitative Serv’s, 545 So.2d 455, 458 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The Order of Adjudication of Dependency is VACATED and the cause REMANDED for further proceedings.

BARFIELD, KAHN and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

827 So. 2d 1089, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14788, 2002 WL 31295102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ms-v-department-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack