M.S., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 30, 2022
Docket21-3027
StatusPublished

This text of M.S., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES (M.S., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
M.S., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

M.S., the father, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, and GUARDIAN AD LITEM Appellees.

No. 4D21-3027

[March 30, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Shari Africk Olefson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 19-2091DP.

Albert W. Guffanti of Albert W. Guffanti, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Carolyn Schwarz of Children’s Legal Services, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Department of Children and Families.

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sarah Todd Weitz, Senior Attorney, Statewide Guardian ad Litem office, Tallahassee, for appellee Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion, on all arguments raised, the circuit court’s final order terminating the father’s parental rights. As in V.S. v. Department of Children & Families, 322 So. 3d 1153 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021), we also certify the following question of great public importance to the supreme court:

Does the 2014 amendment to section 39.806(1)(f), Florida Statutes, which provides that no proof of nexus between egregious conduct toward one child is required to terminate the parental rights of the child’s siblings, unconstitutionally remove the state’s burden to prove that the egregious conduct poses a substantial risk of harm to each sibling and is the least restrictive means of protecting the sibling(s) from serious harm? Affirmed; question certified.

CONNER, C.J., GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
M.S., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ms-the-father-v-department-of-children-and-families-fladistctapp-2022.