Mrs. Mae Mallary Salyer, MacCampbell Mallary and Rene R. Nicaud v. California Company

Fifth Circuit

Mrs. Mae Mallary Salyer, MacCampbell Mallary and Rene R. Nicaud v. California Company

262 F.2d 589

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 3, 1959

Docket17428_1

StatusPublished

This text of 262 F.2d 589 (Mrs. Mae Mallary Salyer, MacCampbell Mallary and Rene R. Nicaud v. California Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mrs. Mae Mallary Salyer, MacCampbell Mallary and Rene R. Nicaud v. California Company, 262 F.2d 589 (5th Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs below brought this suit for partial cancellation of an oil and gas *590 lease. Submitted on a stipulation of facts and on motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs and defendant, there was a judgment for defendant, and appellants, attacking the judgment as unwarranted in law, are here seeking its reversal.

Appellee, taking the contrary position, insists that the judgment was right and should be affirmed. A careful examination of the opinion of the district judge, 1 in the light of the record and briefs, convinces us that this is so. For the reasons and upon the considerations fully and correctly set out in his opinion, the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

1

. Salyer v. California Co., D.C., 164 F.Supp. 287.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs below brought this suit for partial cancellation of an oil and gas *590 lease. Submitted on a stipulation of facts and on motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs and defendant, there was a judgment for defendant, and appellants, attacking the judgment as unwarranted in law, are here seeking its reversal.

Appellee, taking the contrary position, insists that the judgment was right and should be affirmed. A careful examination of the opinion of the district judge, 1 in the light of the record and briefs, convinces us that this is so. For the reasons and upon the considerations fully and correctly set out in his opinion, the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

1

. Salyer v. California Co., D.C., 164 F.Supp. 287.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 F.2d 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mrs-mae-mallary-salyer-maccampbell-mallary-and-rene-r-nicaud-v-ca5-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack