Mrs. J. L. Vance, Jr. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company of Bloomington, Illinois

Sixth Circuit

Mrs. J. L. Vance, Jr. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company of Bloomington, Illinois

260 F.2d 359

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 25, 1958

Docket13479

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 F.2d 359 (Mrs. J. L. Vance, Jr. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company of Bloomington, Illinois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mrs. J. L. Vance, Jr. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company of Bloomington, Illinois, 260 F.2d 359 (6th Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After consideration of the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys and the record in the case, we have reached the conclusion that United States District Judge Miller was correct in dismissing this action upon the basis of his findings of fact, conclusions of law and opinion.

Upon that basis, the judgment of the United States District Court is ordered to be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After consideration of the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys and the record in the case, we have reached the conclusion that United States District Judge Miller was correct in dismissing this action upon the basis of his findings of fact, conclusions of law and opinion.

Upon that basis, the judgment of the United States District Court is ordered to be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 F.2d 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mrs-j-l-vance-jr-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-company-of-ca6-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack