Mrs. Eloise Carter v. Mrs. Lois Croswell

325 F.2d 431, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6870
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 2, 1964·No. 20259·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for rehearing in this case informs us that prior to our decision (323 F.2d 696 (5th Cir. 1963)) the claim -of the plaintiff was settled. Our decision was based upon the representation that this was a partial appeal, because the issue of damages remained for determination by the district court. However the settlement, of which we were not made aware, left nothing pending in the district court.

We therefore grant the petition for rehearing and withdraw the previous decision. Approaching the case on the merits, we reverse the judgment of the lower court and remand the matter for trial of the issues raised by the counterclaim. Robbins v. Milner Enterprises, Inc., 278 F.2d 492 (5th Cir. 1960); Braniff v. Jackson Avenue-Gretna Ferry, Inc., 280 F.2d 523 (5th Cir. 1960); Stanley v. Guy Scroggins Const. Co., 297 F.2d 374 (5th Cir. 1961).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mrs. Eloise Carter v. Mrs. Lois Croswell, 325 F.2d 431, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6870 (5th Cir. 1964).

325 F.2d 431 (Mrs. Eloise Carter v. Mrs. Lois Croswell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
720 F. Supp. 373 (D. Delaware, 1989)
United States v. O'Neil
709 F.2d 361 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)