Mrs. Edna Latil Nichols v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
This text of 310 F.2d 704 (Mrs. Edna Latil Nichols v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant having failed to object to the argument now contended to having been prejudicial, and no plain error or abdication of function by the District Judge appearing, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Reid, 5th Cir., 1935, 76 F.2d 30; Louisiana & Arkansas Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 5th Cir., 1954, 214 F.2d 290, cert. den. 1954, 348 U.S. 875, 75 S.Ct. 111, 99 L.Ed. 688; Ford v. United Gas Corp., 5th Cir., 1958, 254 F.2d 817, cert. den. 358 U.S. 824, 79 S.Ct. 40, 3 L.Ed.2d 64.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
310 F.2d 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mrs-edna-latil-nichols-v-hartford-accident-indemnity-company-ca5-1962.