Mrozieski v. Automobile Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mrozieski v. Automobile Insurance

243 A.D. 676

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 676 (Mrozieski v. Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mrozieski v. Automobile Insurance, 243 A.D. 676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, upon stipulation made in open court that certain witnesses, if called by defendant, would testify as stated by defendant’s counsel. All concur, except Taylor and Edgcomb, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the ground that plaintiff’s right to amend is barred by Ms laches in view of the plaintiff’s knowledge of the facts alleged in Ms proposed [677]*677amended complaint since before the time of the trial. (The order grants leave to serve an amended complaint in an action upon a fire insurance policy.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs, upon stipulation made in open court that certain witnesses, if called by defendant, would testify as stated by defendant’s counsel. All concur, except Taylor and Edgcomb, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the ground that plaintiff’s right to amend is barred by Ms laches in view of the plaintiff’s knowledge of the facts alleged in Ms proposed [677]*677amended complaint since before the time of the trial. (The order grants leave to serve an amended complaint in an action upon a fire insurance policy.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mrozieski-v-automobile-insurance-nyappdiv-1935.