Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Mroz v. McCampbell

Mroz v. McCampbell

699 So. 2d 1392, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12245, 1997 WL 673726
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 30, 1997
DocketNo. 97-3726
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 699 So. 2d 1392 (Mroz v. McCampbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mroz v. McCampbell, 699 So. 2d 1392, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12245, 1997 WL 673726 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We grant the habeas petition and order petitioner’s immediate release from deten[1393]*1393tion, without prejudice to the trial court to place petitioner again in detention in compliance with Pompey v. Cochran, 685 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). In particular, the contempt order fails to contain an affirmative finding by the trial court that petitioner possessed the present ability to pay the purge amount. See id. at 1015. No motion for rehearing will be entertained by this court, and the clerk is directed to issue mandate immediately.

GLICKSTEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur. GROSS, J., specially concurs with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Palma v. Jenne
763 So. 2d 359 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
699 So. 2d 1392, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12245, 1997 WL 673726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mroz-v-mccampbell-fladistctapp-1997.