Mroz v. McCampbell

699 So. 2d 1392, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12245, 1997 WL 673726
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 30, 1997·No. No. 97-3726·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We grant the habeas petition and order petitioner’s immediate release from deten[1393] tion, without prejudice to the trial court to place petitioner again in detention in compliance with Pompey v. Cochran, 685 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). In particular, the contempt order fails to contain an affirmative finding by the trial court that petitioner possessed the present ability to pay the purge amount. See id. at 1015. No motion for rehearing will be entertained by this court, and the clerk is directed to issue mandate immediately.

GLICKSTEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur. GROSS, J., specially concurs with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mroz v. McCampbell, 699 So. 2d 1392, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12245, 1997 WL 673726 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

699 So. 2d 1392 (Mroz v. McCampbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Palma v. Jenne
763 So. 2d 359 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)