M'Rae v. Bates

Virginia Chancery Court

M'Rae v. Bates

4 Va. 490

DecidedFebruary 15, 1810

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Va. 490 (M'Rae v. Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Virginia Chancery Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M'Rae v. Bates, 4 Va. 490 (Va. Super. Ct. 1810).

Pincite

Opinion

IN this case Mr. Dade proposed to take a decree, without an account, to be levied of the goods and chattels of the T/ze Chancellor objected to it upon this ground, that if the decree was not satisfied, the plaintiff would have . .... to go to law to fix a devastavit, or to come again mto this Court for an account, which if directed now, the decree may be a personal one, in the event of assets; and if necessary, the bill can be so amended as to extend to the remotest responsibility. Mr. Dade then withdrew his proposition, and took an order for an account.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN this case Mr. Dade proposed to take a decree, without an account, to be levied of the goods and chattels of the T/ze Chancellor objected to it upon this ground, that if the decree was not satisfied, the plaintiff would have . .... to go to law to fix a devastavit, or to come again mto this Court for an account, which if directed now, the decree may be a personal one, in the event of assets; and if necessary, the bill can be so amended as to extend to the remotest responsibility. Mr. Dade then withdrew his proposition, and took an order for an account.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Va. 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mrae-v-bates-vachanct-1810.