M'Rae v. Bates

4 Va. 490
Virginia Chancery Court·Decided February 15, 1810·Published

Opinion

IN this case Mr. Dade proposed to take a decree, without an account, to be levied of the goods and chattels of the T/ze Chancellor objected to it upon this ground, that if the decree was not satisfied, the plaintiff would have . .... to go to law to fix a devastavit, or to come again mto this Court for an account, which if directed now, the decree may be a personal one, in the event of assets; and if necessary, the bill can be so amended as to extend to the remotest responsibility. Mr. Dade then withdrew his proposition, and took an order for an account.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M'Rae v. Bates, 4 Va. 490 (Va. Super. Ct. 1810).

4 Va. 490 (M'Rae v. Bates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.