M.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

M.R. v. State

573 So. 2d 1066, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 979, 1991 WL 15565

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 12, 1991

DocketNo. 89-966

StatusPublished

This text of 573 So. 2d 1066 (M.R. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M.R. v. State, 573 So. 2d 1066, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 979, 1991 WL 15565 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

M.R., a juvenile, appeals his adjudication of delinquency predicated upon his violation of Miami Springs Ordinance 16-17.1 (also known as Ordinance No. 268, Section I), contending that the said ordinance is unconstitutional.

In the Answer Brief filed in this Court, Appellee, the State of Florida, “concedes that the City of Miami Springs Ordinance, Section I in question, ... is unconstitutional.”

Based on the foregoing concession which is consistent with S. W. v. State, 431 So.2d 339 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); and W.J.W. v. State, 356 So.2d 48, 50 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); we hold that Section I of the ordinance in question is unconstitutional. Accordingly, the adjudication of delinquency that was entered against the appellant herein for violation of that section of the ordinance must be reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI