Mr. Travel, Inc. v. V.I.P. Travel Service, Inc.
385 F.2d 420, 155 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 231
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided October 4, 1967·No. 16077_1·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
In this action for trademark infringement and unfair competition, Mr. Travel, Inc. has complained that the defendant travel service infringed the service mark “mr. travel”. The complaint also charged that defendant improperly used a caricature associated with the plaintiff’s mark. The District Court held that there was no infringement or unfair competition. 268 F.Supp. 958. We agree with the reasoning of the opinion below. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mr. Travel, Inc. v. V.I.P. Travel Service, Inc., 385 F.2d 420, 155 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 231 (7th Cir. 1967).
385 F.2d 420 (Mr. Travel, Inc. v. V.I.P. Travel Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schwinn Bicycle Co. v. Ross Bicycles, Inc.
678 F. Supp. 1336 (N.D. Illinois, 1988)
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Hibernia Bank
665 F. Supp. 800 (N.D. California, 1987)
Source Services Corp. v. Source Telecomputing Corp.
635 F. Supp. 600 (N.D. Illinois, 1986)
Thompson v. Spring-Green Lawn Care Corp.
466 N.E.2d 1004 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1984)
Reddy Communications, Inc. v. Environmental Action Foundation
477 F. Supp. 936 (District of Columbia, 1979)
Reddy Communications v. Environmental Action
477 F. Supp. 936 (District of Columbia, 1979)
T. G. I. Friday's, Inc. v. International Restaurant Group, Inc.
405 F. Supp. 698 (M.D. Louisiana, 1975)
National Football League Properties, Inc. v. Consumer Enterprises, Inc.
327 N.E.2d 242 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1975)
Grotrian, Helfferich, Schulz, Th. Steinweg Nachf. v. Steinway & Sons
365 F. Supp. 707 (S.D. New York, 1973)
WSM, Inc. v. Bailey
297 F. Supp. 870 (M.D. Tennessee, 1969)