Mr. Green Jade, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of London

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mr. Green Jade, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of London

320 S.W.3d 725, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1248, 2010 WL 3681199

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 2010·No. ED 93814·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Mr. Green Jade, Inc., appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Underwriters at Lloyds of London, on the plaintiffs claim to recover for fire loss. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5). And we deny all pending motions before this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Mr. Green Jade, Inc., appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Underwriters at Lloyds of London, on the plaintiffs claim to recover for fire loss. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5). And we deny all pending motions before this Court.

Mr. Green Jade, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, 320 S.W.3d 725, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1248, 2010 WL 3681199 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

320 S.W.3d 725 (Mr. Green Jade, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of London) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related