Mr. And Mrs Claude Songy, Jr. v. Coastal Chemical Corporation

469 F.2d 709, 16 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1160, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6616
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 21, 1972·No. 72-1354·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal challenges the district court’s refusal to permit plaintiffs-appellants to proceed as a class under the provisions of Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(c) (1) to recover damages and obtain injunctive *710 relief from air and noise pollution allegedly caused, by defendants-appellees industries’ chemical manufacturing activities.

We conclude that our jurisdiction cannot be supported under the “death knell” concept; Korn v. Franchard Corp., 2 Cir. 1971, 443 F.2d 1301, Green v. Wolf Corp., 2 Cir. 1968, 406 F.2d 791, cert. denied 395 U.S. 977, 89 S.Ct. 2131, 23 L.Ed.2d 766, Eisen v. Carlisle and Jacquelin, 2 Cir. 1966, 370 F.2d 119, cert. denied 386 U.S. 1035, 87 S.Ct. 1487, 18 L.Ed.2d 598, or under the so-called “collateral order” exception of the statute, Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 1949, 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528. The district court’s ruling is not a final judgment under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291, Gosa v. Securities Investment Company, 5 Cir. 1971, 449 F.2d 1330.

Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. And Mrs Claude Songy, Jr. v. Coastal Chemical Corporation, 469 F.2d 709, 16 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1160, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6616 (5th Cir. 1972).

469 F.2d 709 (Mr. And Mrs Claude Songy, Jr. v. Coastal Chemical Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related