MPI LLC v. Sorting Robotics, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California·Decided September 13, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-07464·Unknown

Opinion

1 Matthew De Preter (pro hac vice) ARONBERG GOLDGEHN DAVIS AND GARMISA 225 W. Washington Street, Suite 2800 3 Chicago, IL 60606 4 312-755-3153 Email: cdepreter@agdglaw.com 5 6 Lena N. Bacani (SBN 213556) lena.bacani@lozaip.com 7 ILOZA & LOZA, LLP g N. Second Ave., Ste. 127 Upland, CA 91786 9 ! Telephone: (877) 406-5164 10 Facsimile: (213) 394-3625 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff MPI LLC V2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 15 MPI LLC, CASE No. 2:22—cv—07464-JAK-PD 16 Plaintiff, Vv. [Hon. John A. Kronstadt] 17 SORTING ROBOTICS, INC., 18 Defendant. STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF 19 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 21 SORTING ROBOTICS, INC., CounterClaimant, Vv. 23 MPI LLC, 4 CounterDefendant. 25 26 27 28

1 Plaintiff MPI LLC (“MPI”) and Defendant, Sorting Robotics, Inc. (“Sorting 2 Robotics”) (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, 3 stipulate and agree as follows: 4 Certain documents and information have been and may be sought, produced, 5 or exhibited by and among the Parties in this action (the “Action”) that relate to or 6 reveal the Parties’ confidential and proprietary information or otherwise contain 7 confidential and sensitive information. The Parties agree that the confidentiality of 8 these documents and information should be preserved in the manner set forth in the 9 proposed Stipulated Protective Order submitted with this Stipulation and Joint 10 Motion, attached as Exhibit A. 11 The Stipulated Protective Order attached as Exhibit A is based on the Court’s 12 form Protective Order. Modifications from the Court’s form Protective Order are 13 shown in the redline attached as Exhibit B. 14 The Court is authorized to enter such orders under Federal Rule of Civil 15 Procedure 26(c)(1)(G). The entry of the proposed Confidentiality and Protective 16 Order will serve the purposes of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure providing 17 efficiencies in discovery in this Action. Further, the protection of privileged and 18 protected information is necessary to protect certain sensitive business information 19 that could, if disclosed, prejudice and harm the holder of such information. 20 Accordingly, the Parties agree, and jointly move and request the Court enter 21 the proposed Stipulated Protective Order submitted herewith. 22

23 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated this 12th day of September, 2023. 24

26 27 1 Dated: September 12, 2023 HANKIN PATENT LAW APC GARMISA 3

4 /s/ Matthew De Preter/ 5 Matthew De Preter (admitted pro hac /s/ /Anooj Patel/ 6 vice) Anooj Patel Alexandra R. Benigni (admitted pro hac SBN: 300297 7 vice) 12400 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1265 8 ARONBERG GOLDGEHN DAVIS & Los Angeles, CA 90025 GARMISA Telephone: (310) 979-3600 9 225 W. Washington Street, Suite 2800 Email: 10 Chicago, Illinois 60606 marc@hankinpatentlaw.com (312) 828-9600 11 cdepreter@agdglaw.com 12 abenigni@agdglaw.com Attorneys for Defendant Sorting Robotics, Inc. 13 Lena N. Bacani (SBN 213556) 14 lena.bacani@lozaip.com 305 N. Second Ave., Ste. 127 16 Upland, CA 91786 17 Telephone: (877) 406-5164 Facsimile: (213) 394-3625 18 19 Attorneys for Plaintiff MPI LLC 20 21 22 23 4863-2566-6942, v. 1 24 25 26 27 ,_ || Matthew De Preter (pro hac vice) ARONBERG GOLDGEHN DAVIS AND GARMISA 2 North Wabash Avenue Suite 1700 3 Chicago, IL 60611 312-755-3153 4 Email: cdepreter@agdglaw.com 5 Lena N. Bacani (SBN 213556) 6 lena.bacani@lozaip.com z || LOZA & LOZA, LLP 305 N. Second Ave., Ste. 127 8 Upland, CA 91786 9 Telephone: (877) 406-5164 Facsimile: (213) 394-3625 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff MPI LLC

12 B UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15 MPI LLC, CASE No. 2:22—cv—07464-JAK-PD 16 Loe Plaintiff, 17 Vv. 18 SORTING ROBOTICS, INC., AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendant. 19 SORTING ROBOTICS, INC., 20 . CounterClaimant, 21 Vv. MPILLC, CounterDefendant. 23 24 95 Based on the parties’ Stipulation, and for good cause shown therein and 56 Zecited herein, the Court finds and orders as follows. >7 || 1. A.PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 28

1 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, > || Proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 3 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 4 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 5 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 6 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 7 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends g || Only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment g || under the applicable legal principles. This action is likely to involve trade secrets, customer and pricing lists and other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical and/or 13 Proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and 14 from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such 15 Confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other 16 things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding 7 confidential business practices, or other confidential research, development, or 1g |} Commercial information (including information implicating privacy nghts of third 19 Parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may 39 be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, 31 court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of 33 discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to 34 keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses 35 of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their 36 handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order 37 for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MPI LLC v. Sorting Robotics, Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2023).

MPI LLC v. Sorting Robotics, Inc. (MPI LLC v. Sorting Robotics, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Makar-Wellbon v. Sony Electronics, Inc.
187 F.R.D. 576 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1999)