MPEG LA, L.L.C. v. Toshiba Am. Info. Sys., Inc.

2019 NY Slip Op 5098
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 25, 2019
Docket9737N 162716/15
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 5098 (MPEG LA, L.L.C. v. Toshiba Am. Info. Sys., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MPEG LA, L.L.C. v. Toshiba Am. Info. Sys., Inc., 2019 NY Slip Op 5098 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

MPEG LA, L.L.C. v Toshiba Am. Info. Sys., Inc. (2019 NY Slip Op 05098)
MPEG LA, L.L.C. v Toshiba Am. Info. Sys., Inc.
2019 NY Slip Op 05098
Decided on June 25, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 25, 2019
Gische, J.P., Tom, Kapnick, Kern, Moulton, JJ.

9737N 162716/15

[*1] MPEG LA, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, Toshiba Corporation, Defendant.


Gibbons P.C., New York (William P. Deni of counsel), and Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner, Atlanta, GA (Shawn Chang of the bar of the State of Georgia, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for appellant.

Windels Marx Lane & Mittendorf, LLP, New York (John D. Holden of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered January 7, 2019, which denied defendant's motion to compel discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion by denying the motion to compel the production of documents that have no bearing on the issues in this breach of contract action (see Andon v 302-304 Mott St. Assoc. , 94 NY2d 740, 745 [2000]). Moreover, the court providently determined that some of the

document requests were vague and overbroad (see e.g. Lerner v 300 W. 17th St. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp. , 232 AD2d 249 [1st Dept 1996]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JUNE 25, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street Associates
731 N.E.2d 589 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
Lerner v. 300 West 17th Street Housing Development Fund Corp.
232 A.D.2d 249 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 5098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mpeg-la-llc-v-toshiba-am-info-sys-inc-nyappdiv-2019.