M.P. VS. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES (DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES)

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedNovember 28, 2018
DocketA-5177-16T4
StatusUnpublished

This text of M.P. VS. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES (DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES) (M.P. VS. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES (DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
M.P. VS. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES (DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES), (N.J. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5177-16T4

M.P.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES and OCEAN COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES 1,

Respondents-Respondents. ___________________________

Argued October 30, 2018 – Decided November 28, 2018

Before Judges Hoffman and Geiger.

On appeal from New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services.

Laurie M. Higgins argued the cause for appellant (Sb2 Inc., attorneys; John Pendergast, on the brief).

Caroline Gargione, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Division of Medical

1 Respondent Ocean County Board of Social Services has not filed a brief. Assistance and Health Services (Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General, attorney; Melissa H. Raksa, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Caroline Gargione, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

Petitioner M.P. appeals from the final agency decision of respondent

Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services (Division) denying his

application for Medicaid benefits. We affirm.

Petitioner was admitted to Monmouth Medical Center (Monmouth

Medical) on July 31, 2015. On August 11, 2015, Monmouth Medical submitted

an Enhanced At-Risk Criteria Screening Tool (EARC-PAS) to the Division of

Aging Services, Office of Community Choice Options (OCCO) authorizing

petitioner's transfer from the hospital to a Medicaid certified nursing facility.2

The EARC-PAS is a screening tool for a ninety-day authorization for acute care

hospital patients being discharged to a Medicaid certified nursing facility.

Following review of the EARC-PAS, petitioner was authorized by OCCO for an

initial ninety days pending determination of Medicaid clinical and financial

eligibility. Thus, although petitioner's transfer to a nursing facility for up to

ninety days was authorized, he was not yet determined to be Medicaid eligible.

2 OCCO is responsible for establishing clinical eligibility for individuals seeking Medicare services through a waiver program. A-5177-16T4 2 Petitioner was discharged to Liberty Royal Rehabilitation and Health Care

Center (Liberty Royal), a Medicaid certified nursing home, on August 12, 2015.

Less than one week later he was transferred to Crystal Lake Nursing and

Rehabilitation Center (Crystal Lake), another Medicaid certified nursing home,

on August 17, 2015. Petitioner remained at Crystal Lake until his discharge

home on November 6, 2015.

Nursing facilities are required to submit a request for Medicaid eligibility

within forty-eight hours of a patient's admission. N.J.A.C. 8:85-1.8(c). The

request is made by submission of a Notification from Long-Term Care Facility

of the Admission or Termination of a Medicaid Patient (LTC-2) form. Ibid.

Submission of an LTC-2 form triggers Pre-Admission Screening (PAS) by

OCCO to determine the patient's eligibility for Medicaid payment of nursing

facility services. N.J.A.C. 8:85-1.8(d). Neither Liberty Royal nor Crystal Lake

submitted an LTC-2 form on petitioner's behalf within forty-eight hours of his

admission to their facilities.

Crystal Lake submitted an LTC-2 form on petitioner's behalf on

November 19, 2015, some thirteen days after his discharge home on November

6, 2015. At the time petitioner applied for Medicaid, petitioner's monthly

income was $1080.96, which exceeded the federal poverty level guidelines. At

A-5177-16T4 3 the time of his admission, petitioner had to earn $1010 or less per month, to be

eligible for Medicaid payment of nursing facility services. See N.J.A.C. 10:71-

3.14(e)(2), -5.3(a)(18). Given his income level, petitioner could only be eligible

for Medicaid through the Managed Long Term Care Service and Support

(MLTSS) waiver program approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid

Services pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1315. The special terms and conditions of the

MLTSS waiver program include both clinical and financial eligibility

components. Clinical eligibility for institutional waiver services require an

applicant to meet nursing facility level of care. See 42 C.F.R. § 435.236; 42

C.F.R. § 435.1005; N.J. Comprehensive Waiver Demonstration, Special Terms

and Conditions, 11-w-00279/2 (Title XIX), at 18-19 (August 14, 2014).

Upon receiving the LTC-2 form, the Ocean County Board of Social

Services submitted a referral to OCCO for a clinical eligibility determination.

Notwithstanding the untimeliness of the LTC-2 form, OCCO attempted to

schedule the PAS required to establish Medicaid clinical eligibility. Upon being

contacted by OCCO staff, petitioner refused to meet with OCCO staff, stating

he was not in need of any services. As a result, a PAS was not completed,

leading to the denial of petitioner's Medicaid application pursuant to N.J.A.C.

10:71-3.14.

A-5177-16T4 4 Petitioner timely appealed the denial of his Medicaid application. The

appeal was transferred to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) as a contested

case, and a fair hearing was conducted by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ).

Petitioner did not attend the fair hearing. The ALJ issued an initial decision

affirming the denial of petitioner's Medicaid application and dismissing his

appeal. No exceptions were filed. The Division's final agency decision adopted

the ALJ's initial decision.

The Division's Director explained that the process for determining clinical

eligibility places responsibility on the nursing home to seek a PAS by submitting

the required form within 48 hours of admission to the facility. Here, the nursing

home submitted the required form on November 19, 2015; nearly three months

after having been admitted and a week and a half after being discharged. When

OCCO attempted to reach petitioner to complete a PAS, petitioner refused to

cooperate or meet with OCCO staff.

The Director further explained:

Petitioner's only path to eligibility for Medicaid benefits is under the Long-Term Care Services and Supports (LTSS) program that permits use of a higher income level – 300 percent of the SSI benefit amount. In order for eligibility to be granted at this higher income level, nursing level of care must be necessary. See 42 CFR § 435.236 and 42 CFR § 435.1005. In order to determine medically necessary services in a

A-5177-16T4 5 nursing home, a pre-admission screening (PAS) is completed by "professional staff designated by the Department, based on a comprehensive needs assessment which demonstrates that the recipient requires, at a minimum, the basic [nursing facility] services described in N.J.A.C. 8:85-2.2." N.J.A.C. 8:85-2.1(a). See also, N.J.S.A. 30:4D-17.10, et seq.

This appeal followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barone v. Department of Human Services
526 A.2d 1055 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1987)
Il v. Nj Dept. of Human Services
913 A.2d 122 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2006)
Brady v. Board of Review
704 A.2d 547 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1997)
Barone v. D. of Human Serv., Div. of Med. Asst.
509 A.2d 786 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
In Re Virtua-West Jersey Hospital Voorhees for a Certificate of Need
945 A.2d 692 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2008)
Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of Securities
312 A.2d 497 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1973)
K.K. v. Div. of Med. Assistance & Health Servs.
180 A.3d 732 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
M.P. VS. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES (DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mp-vs-division-of-medical-assistance-and-health-services-division-of-njsuperctappdiv-2018.