M.P. v. State

255 So. 3d 505
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in M.P. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 256 So. 3d 231
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 26, 2018·No. No. 3D17-1697·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Arizona v. Johnson, 555 U.S. 323, 333, 129 S.Ct. 781, 172 L.Ed.2d 694 (2009) ("[A] traffic stop of a car communicates to a reasonable passenger that he or she is not free to terminate the encounter with the police and move about at will.").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M.P. v. State, 255 So. 3d 505 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

255 So. 3d 505 (M.P. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arizona v. Johnson
555 U.S. 323 (Supreme Court, 2009)