Mozzochi v. McNary

Connecticut Appellate Court

Mozzochi v. McNary

541 A.2d 547, 14 Conn. App. 811, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 192

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedApril 21, 1988

Docket6014

StatusPublished

This text of 541 A.2d 547 (Mozzochi v. McNary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mozzochi v. McNary, 541 A.2d 547, 14 Conn. App. 811, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 192 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After our plenary analysis of the record, transcripts and briefs submitted with this appeal [812]*812and after affording the plaintiffs claims of error the appropriate scope of review, we determine that the factual findings of the trial court are not clearly erroneous and that its decision conformed to the applicable law. Practice Book § 4061.

Further, the defendant’s request for sanctions, pursuant to Practice Book § 2036 (5), is denied.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

After our plenary analysis of the record, transcripts and briefs submitted with this appeal [812]*812and after affording the plaintiffs claims of error the appropriate scope of review, we determine that the factual findings of the trial court are not clearly erroneous and that its decision conformed to the applicable law. Practice Book § 4061.

Further, the defendant’s request for sanctions, pursuant to Practice Book § 2036 (5), is denied.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

541 A.2d 547, 14 Conn. App. 811, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mozzochi-v-mcnary-connappct-1988.