Mozone v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mozone v. State

777 So. 2d 1207, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1821, 2001 WL 167005

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 21, 2001

DocketNo. 3D00-2564

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 777 So. 2d 1207 (Mozone v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mozone v. State, 777 So. 2d 1207, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1821, 2001 WL 167005 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Shink Mozone, Jr., appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The trial court correctly denied relief under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000). See Dunenas v. Moore, 762 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Appellant is not entitled to credit against his incarceration for time he previously served on probation. See Young v. State, 697 So.2d 75, 76 (Fla.1997).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Shink Mozone, Jr., appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The trial court correctly denied relief under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000). See Dunenas v. Moore, 762 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Appellant is not entitled to credit against his incarceration for time he previously served on probation. See Young v. State, 697 So.2d 75, 76 (Fla.1997).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

777 So. 2d 1207, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1821, 2001 WL 167005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mozone-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack