Moyer v. TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC.
11 A.3d 960, 608 Pa. 385, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 181
This text of 11 A.3d 960 (Moyer v. TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Moyer v. TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC., 11 A.3d 960, 608 Pa. 385, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 181 (Pa. 2011).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the following issue, as stated by Petitioners:
Did the Superior Court improperly afford blanket immunity to manufacturers for negligence and strict liability in their written instructions under GARA’s rolling provision under the guise of fostering a non-existent federal policy to vindicate rights of manufacturers over those of accident victims?
The Application for Leave to File Reply to The Answers of Respondents is hereby denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Oliver v. City of Pittsburgh
11 A.3d 960 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 A.3d 960, 608 Pa. 385, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moyer-v-teledyne-continental-motors-inc-pa-2011.