Moyer v. TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC.

11 A.3d 960, 608 Pa. 385, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 181
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 25, 2011·No. 450 EAL 2009·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the following issue, as stated by Petitioners:

Did the Superior Court improperly afford blanket immunity to manufacturers for negligence and strict liability in their written instructions under GARA’s rolling provision under the guise of fostering a non-existent federal policy to vindicate rights of manufacturers over those of accident victims?

The Application for Leave to File Reply to The Answers of Respondents is hereby denied as moot.

Madame Justice Orie Melvin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moyer v. TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC., 11 A.3d 960, 608 Pa. 385, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 181 (Pa. 2011).

11 A.3d 960 (Moyer v. TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oliver v. City of Pittsburgh
11 A.3d 960 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)