Moyer v. City of Pottsville

320 A.2d 145, 13 Pa. Commw. 504, 1974 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 971
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 20, 1974
DocketAppeal, No. 1392 C.D. 1973
StatusPublished

This text of 320 A.2d 145 (Moyer v. City of Pottsville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moyer v. City of Pottsville, 320 A.2d 145, 13 Pa. Commw. 504, 1974 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 971 (Pa. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

This appeal is from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board reversing a Referee’s grant of [505]*505compensation to George W. Moyer (Moyer) under Section 104 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §22, which allows compensation to volunteer firemen under limited circumstances. The decision of the Board was dated September 27, 1973, and mailed to the parties thereto the same day. Moyer filed his appeal with this Court on October 16, 1973, the last day of the twenty day appeal period available to him under the 1972 amendment to Section 427 of the Act, 77 P.S. §§873, 874.1 See George General v. E. Roseman Co., 10 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 569, 312 A. 2d 609 (1973) (wherein we held that mailing of the Board’s decision constituted service, starting the running of the twenty day appeal period, but receipt of the appeal of this Court constituted filing of the appeal). Although his appeal was timely filed, Moyer did not file exceptions to the Board’s order until October 26, 1973. This Court recently held in Annette Phillips v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 10 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 521, 311 A. 2d 175 (1973) that Section 427 requires that both the appeal itself and exceptions be filed within twenty days of service of notice of the Board’s decision in order to perfect an appeal to this Court.

As the record in this case reveals that Moyer’s appeal was not perfected within the twenty day appeal period, and an extension of the above time limitation [506]*506lias neither been applied for nor granted, we are without jurisdiction in this matter, and therefore must quash the appeal sua sponte.

Order

Now, this 20th day of May, 1974, the appeal of George W. Moyer is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phillips v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
311 A.2d 175 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
General v. E. Roseman Co.
312 A.2d 609 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
320 A.2d 145, 13 Pa. Commw. 504, 1974 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moyer-v-city-of-pottsville-pacommwct-1974.