Moye v. Walker
This text of 22 S.E. 276 (Moye v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where suit was brought in a justice’s court and the summons was duly served by leaving a copy thereof at the residence of the defendant, a judgment by default thereafter rendered against him was legal and valid, although when the service •of the summons was made as above stated, the defendant was tem[770]*770porarily absent from his home in attendance upon a sick wife, and never in fact received or saw the summons. Burbage v. American National Bank, 95 Ga. 503.
Brought forward from the last term.
2. Under the decision of this court in Brooks v. Mutual Loan and Banking Co., 95 Ga. 178, a notary public who is an ex officio justice of the peace may, in a city having a population of over 5,000, lawfully hold his court at a time different from that at which the justice of the peace of the same district holds his court; and the same is true as to place. Moreover, if the judgment rendered by a justice’s court is void because the court was not lawfully in session, advantage may be taken of the fact by illegality.
3. There was no error in sustaining the demurrer to the plaintiff’s equitable petition. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 S.E. 276, 96 Ga. 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moye-v-walker-ga-1895.