Moye v. State

187 S.E. 693, 54 Ga. App. 283, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 539
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 25, 1936
Docket25855
StatusPublished

This text of 187 S.E. 693 (Moye v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moye v. State, 187 S.E. 693, 54 Ga. App. 283, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 539 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of burglary. The evidence tending to connect him with the offense was wholly circumstantial, and, while raising a suspicion against him, was insufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. The court erred in refusing . to grant a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 S.E. 693, 54 Ga. App. 283, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moye-v-state-gactapp-1936.