Moye v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Moye v. State

805 So. 2d 1057, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 378, 2002 WL 83761

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 23, 2002

DocketNo. 1D01-3011

StatusPublished

This text of 805 So. 2d 1057 (Moye v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moye v. State, 805 So. 2d 1057, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 378, 2002 WL 83761 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed a motion in the trial court purportedly pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). The trial court treated the motion as a motion for modification of sentence under Rule 3.800(c), and denied the motion as untimely. The appellant challenges this ruling. We treat the appellant’s notice of appeal as a petition for certiorari and deny the petition. See Davis v. State, 745 So.2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

WEBSTER, LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed a motion in the trial court purportedly pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). The trial court treated the motion as a motion for modification of sentence under Rule 3.800(c), and denied the motion as untimely. The appellant challenges this ruling. We treat the appellant’s notice of appeal as a petition for certiorari and deny the petition. See Davis v. State, 745 So.2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

WEBSTER, LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

805 So. 2d 1057, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 378, 2002 WL 83761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moye-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack