Moye v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Moye v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.

456 So. 2d 948, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2047, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15086

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 18, 1984

DocketNos. 83-2432, 83-2460

StatusPublished

This text of 456 So. 2d 948 (Moye v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moye v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp., 456 So. 2d 948, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2047, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15086 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Declaratory Relief in this case raised a single issue of insurance coverage. We affirm the Final Declaratory Summary Judgment insofar as it finds that the insurance policy issued by General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd. to Florida Machinery Corporation does not provide coverage to any of the named defendants in a separate personal injury action.

We reverse the findings and conclusion on the issue of liability. The question of liability on the part of defendant Florida Machinery Corporation was not before the trial court, and even if it had been, the record reveals that genuine issues of material fact existed so as to preclude summary judgment.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Declaratory Relief in this case raised a single issue of insurance coverage. We affirm the Final Declaratory Summary Judgment insofar as it finds that the insurance policy issued by General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd. to Florida Machinery Corporation does not provide coverage to any of the named defendants in a separate personal injury action.

We reverse the findings and conclusion on the issue of liability. The question of liability on the part of defendant Florida Machinery Corporation was not before the trial court, and even if it had been, the record reveals that genuine issues of material fact existed so as to preclude summary judgment.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

456 So. 2d 948, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2047, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moye-v-general-accident-fire-life-assurance-corp-fladistctapp-1984.