Moya-Perguero v. Trucks & Parts of Tampa, Inc.

77 So. 3d 912, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 969, 2012 WL 193956
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 24, 2012·No. No. 1D11-3425·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, Claimant appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) dismissing Claimant’s petition for benefits (PFB). We reverse and remand because, as Claimant asserts, and as the Employer/Carrier concedes, the JCC erred in sua sponte dismissing the PFB after a hearing on a motion for sanctions requesting only attorney’s fees. Parties are entitled to notice of the issues to be determined at a hearing, and an order that is not in accord with the understanding with which the workers’ compensation hearing was undertaken and participated in is a denial of due process and must be reversed. See Sch. Dist. of Hillsborough Cnty. v. Dickson, 67 So.3d 1080, 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

BENTON, C.J., DAVIS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moya-Perguero v. Trucks & Parts of Tampa, Inc., 77 So. 3d 912, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 969, 2012 WL 193956 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

77 So. 3d 912 (Moya-Perguero v. Trucks & Parts of Tampa, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jose Delgado v. City Concrete Systems, Inc. and FCCI Insurance company
220 So. 3d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)